Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Barnes v. Lane et al
as 2:2025cv00107
Plaintiff:
Cambrin Barnes
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, William F Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Rivers et al
as 2:2025cv00094
Plaintiff:
Billy Mack Nichols, Jr
Defendant:
Rivers, Tracy Bennett, Gary R Kerstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martenz v. Lane
as 2:2025cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Martenz
Defendant:
Stephen Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. Lane
as 2:2025cv00096
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Stephen Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Lane et al

as 4:2025cv00279
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Stephen Lane and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. Lane et al
as 2:2025cv00056
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, William F Straughn, Mose Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Payne et al
as 2:2025cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cambrin Barnes
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Javon Gardner v. Stephen Lane, et al
as 24-1965
Plaintiff:
Javon Henry Gardner
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Norton, Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit, S. Davis, Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
Gardner v. Lane et al

as 2:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Javon Henry Gardner
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, Norton, S Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OTTERMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12742
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LANE OTTERMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.