Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Monaghan v. JPMorgan Chase & Co et al
as 1:2017cv02315
Plaintiff:
James C. Monaghan
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Stirsman v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv01707
Plaintiff:
William Stirsman
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. , Board of Directors of JPMorgan Chase & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Orellana v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2017cv01575
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Orellana
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co. , JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Beach v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 1:2017cv00563
Plaintiff:
Terre Beach
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Board of Directors for JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, JPMorgan Chase & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
In Re: JPMorgan Chase and Co.
as 14-1514
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scrydoff, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary Loeza and Matt Ward
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and John Does 1-100
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bernadette J. Ulissi and others
Ward v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2012cv07091
Plaintiff:
Matt L. Ward
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co. , JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , JPMorgan Comensation 7 Management Development Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
In re JPMorgan Chase and Co. ERISA Litigation
as 1:2012cv04027
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scrydoff
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Company , The JPMorgan Retirement Plan , The JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
