Cases
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-50792
Plaintiff / Appellee: Whole Woman's Health, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center and others
Defendant / Appellant: Judge Austin Reeve Jackson, Penny Clarkston, Mark Lee Dickson and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Whole Woman's Health et al v. Jackson et al Featured Case
as 1:2021cv00616
Plaintiff: Whole Woman's Health, Alamo City Surgery Center PLLC on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Alamo Women's Reproductive Services and others
Defendant: Judge Austin Reeve Jackson, Penny Clarkston, Mark Lee Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aleman v. Texas Medical Board et al
as 7:2021cv00237
Defendant: Texas Medical Board, Sherif Z. Zaafran, M.D., Scott M Freshour and others
Plaintiff: Ruben Aleman, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Texas Medical Board et al
as 7:2020cv00432
Defendant: Texas Medical Board, Jerry Bergman, Scott M. Freshour and others
Plaintiff: Jimmi Rios Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood Center, et al v. Greg Abbott, Governor of TX, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-50314
Defendant / Appellant: PHIL WILSON, in his official capacity as Acting Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, KEN PAXTON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas, KATHERINE A. THOMAS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Board of Nursing and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: BROOKSIDE WOMEN'S MEDICAL CENTER, P.A., doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center, PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER FOR CHOICE, ROBIN WALLACE, M.D., M.A.S. and others
In re: Gregg Abbott, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-50264
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Respondent: SOUTHWESTERN WOMEN'S SURGERY CENTER, WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, ROBIN WALLACE, M.D., M.A.S. and others
Petitioner: KATHERINE A. THOMAS, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Texas Board of Nursing, PHIL WILSON, in his official capacity as Acting Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, In re: GREGG ABBOTT, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas and others
Planned Parenthood Center for Choice et al v. Abbott et al
as 1:2020cv00323
Plaintiff: Whole Woman's Health Alliance, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood South Texas Surgical Center and others
Defendant: Jaime Esparza, Joe Gonzales, Margaret Moore and others
Amicus Curiae: The State of Louisiana and 15 States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Dickerson v. TLC The Laser Eye Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1117
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES BENJAMIN DICKERSON, a/k/a Ben, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: JOHN HOLLMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: TLC THE LASER EYE CENTER INSTITUTE, INC., TLC THE LASER CENTER CAROLINA, INC., TLC THE LASER CENTER MADISON, INC. and others
Hollman v. TLC The Laser Eye Center Institute Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv00685
Plaintiff: John Hollman
Defendant: TLC The Laser Eye Center Institute Inc, TLC The Laser Center Carolina Inc, TLC The Laser Center Madison Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?