Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Sterling v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Danielle Sterling
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Woolford v. Honorable et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Sterling Duane Woolford, Sr
Defendant:
Latonya Honorable and Don Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clements v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Sterling Clements and Nancy Clements
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cummings v. Papa John's USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
David Sterling Cummings
Defendant:
Papa John's USA, Inc. and Kelly Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Elmer Jefferson v. Sterling Akins
as 23-3486
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elmer Lee Jefferson
Defendant / Appellee:
Sterling Akins, External Complaints Program Manager
Sterling Computers Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 4:2023cv04150
Plaintiff:
Sterling Computers Corporation
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Woolford v. Pulaski County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 4:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Sterling Woolford, Sr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Prosecutor's Office and Pulaski County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beck et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
Anjaletta Beck, Arnaldo Santiago, Robert Jerome Taylor and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
