Cases 1 - 10 of 169
Price v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2025cv00425
Plaintiff:
Neil Quintis Price
Defendant:
Kilby Correctional Facility, Medical Providers at Kilby RCC, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Born v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2025cv00366
Petitioner:
Supreme Born
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Calloway et al
as 5:2025cv00359
Petitioner:
Christopher Dean Eugene Brown
Respondent:
Rolanda Calloway and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Terry et al (MAG+)
as 2:2025cv00175
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, John Hamm, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Babers et al
as 2:2025cv00313
Petitioner:
Shawn Garrett Sanders
Respondent:
Gwendolyn Babers and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garner v. Marshall et al
as 2:2025cv00312
Plaintiff:
Marrick Garner
Defendant:
Hon. Steve Marshall and Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv00305
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Calloway et al
as 5:2025cv00133
Petitioner:
Christopher Dewayne Andrews
Respondent:
Rolanda Calloway and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
