Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rowe v. Chapman et al
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Rowe
Defendant:
Steve Chapman, Matthew Rabinowitz, Roy Baynes and others
Morariu v. Chapman et al
as 1:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE MORARIU
Defendant:
STEVE CHAPMAN, MATTHEW RABINOWITZ, ROY BAYNES and others
Nominal Defendant:
NATERA, INC.
CHAPMAN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv19594
Plaintiff:
HOLLY CHAPMAN and STEVE CHAPMAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schneider v. Natera, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
John Harvey Schneider
Defendant:
Natera, Inc., Steve Chapman, Michael Brophy and others
Chapman v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00932
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corp., Getinge AB and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Chapman
as 1:2017cv00885
Plaintiff:
De'Andre Damon Jones
Defendant:
Steve Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Gramiak et al
as 5:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Eric Haynes
Defendant:
Tom Gramiak, Terence Kilpatrick, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vitto v. Gramiak et al
as 5:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Justin Vitto
Defendant:
Tom Gramiak, Terence Kilpatrick, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Chapman
as 4:2011cv03753
Plaintiff:
Richard Darren Goodwin
Defendant:
Steve Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Chatmon v. Winnebago County, et al
as 09-1108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY CHATMON
Defendant - Appellee:
WINNEBAGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, a body politic, STEVE CHAPMAN, in his representative capacity as Winnebago County Administrator and RICHARD A. MEYERS, Sheriff, in his representative capacity as Winnebago County Sheriff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
