Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Julien v. Morales et al
as 1:2016cv00872
Petitioner:
Dywand Daytron Julien
Respondent:
Joe Morales, Steve Hartley, Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murphy v. Cheyene Mountain Re-Entry Center et al
as 1:2015cv02707
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Murphy
Defendant:
Cheyene Mountain Re-Entry Center, Cheyene Mountain Re-Entry Center (I), Steve Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Hartley et al
as 1:2015cv00262
Plaintiff:
Frederick D. Moore
Defendant:
Steve Hartley, Patsy Paulk, Sahib Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tantlinger v. Hanks et al
as 1:2014cv02503
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tantlinger
Defendant:
Lisa Hanks, Steve Hartley, Louis (I) Duchaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Hartley et al
as 1:2013cv02174
Petitioner:
Robert H. Dixon
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eller v. Hartley et al
as 1:2013cv02029
Defendant:
Steve Hartley, Daryl Vigil, Renee Apodaca and others
Plaintiff:
William Eller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Hartley et al
as 1:2013cv02039
Petitioner:
Bruce A. Thompson
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rantz v. Hartley et al
as 1:2013cv00883
Petitioner:
Geoffrey Del Rantz
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lomax v. Trani et al
as 1:2013cv00707
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Lomax
Defendant:
Travis Trani, Angel Medina, Steve Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gandy v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv03331
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Gandy
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Steve Smith, Jerry Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
