Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Shropshire v. Maucere et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Steve Walls, Courtney Hambel, Jason Maucere and others
Plaintiff:
David Shropshire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLING v. KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv00214
Defendant:
DAVID KNOPF, 3G CAPITAL INC., CHRISTOPHER R. SKINGER and others
Plaintiff:
STEVE WALLING and TIMBER HILL LLC
Petitioner:
KRAFT HEINZ INVESTOR GROUP, EARL G. CHESSON REVOCABLE TRYST, THE CHESSON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Ryan Sissom v. Univ of Texas High School, et al
as 17-50913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN SISSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HIGH SCHOOL, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, BETH COOPER, Principal/Director III of University of Texas High School and others
Sissom v. University of Texas High School et al
as 1:2017cv00631
Defendant:
Beth Cooper, Steve Rosen, University of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Sissom
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sissom v. University of Texas High School et al
as 3:2017cv01512
Plaintiff:
Ryan Sissom
Defendant:
University of Texas High School, University of Texas, Beth Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
William Gray, III v. Hearst Communications, Incorpo
as 10-1302
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM B. GRAY, III, d/b/a Greenwood Clinic of Chiropractic, individually and for the benefit and on behalf of all others similarly situated and B AND K SERVICES INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
STEVE WALL AND ASSOCIATES LLC, f/k/a SC Insurance Services LLC, d/b/a Morgan and Associates Incorporated and UNLIMITED SERVICES OF GREENWOOD INCORPORATED, individually and for the benefit and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and WHITE DIRECTORY HOLDINGS CAROLINA INCORPORATED
Defendant - None:
TALKING PHONE BOOK, SAIA HOLDINGS LLC, SAIA PUBLISHING COMPANY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
