Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ludens v. Gilbertson et al

as 5:2020cv05027
Defendant:
Judge Susan M. Sabers, Reed Rasmussen, Judge Jane Wipf Pfeifle and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary D. Ludens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Blair v. Douglas County
as 14-2644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven R. Blair
Defendant - Appellee:
Douglas County, a political subdivision existing and organized in the State of Nebraska
Defendant:
Donald Kleine, Stuart J. Dornan, James Jansen and others
Blair v. Douglas County et al

as 8:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Blair
Defendant:
Douglas County and John Friend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Douglas County et al

as 8:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Blair
Defendant:
Stuart Dornan, Douglas County, Douglas County Court Administrators and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Steven Blair v. City of Omaha, et al

as 11-2014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven R. Blair
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Omaha, political subdivisions existing and organized in the State of Nebraska, Douglas County, political subdivisions existing and organized in the State of Nebraska, Randy Anderson, police officers, all sued in their individual and official capacity, also known as Randy Szemplenski and others
Steven Blair v. NE Dept. of Correctional, et al
as 10-2915
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven R. Blair
Defendant - Appellee:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Harold Clarke, Robert Houston and others
Blair v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al

as 8:2007cv00307
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Blair
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Harold Clarke, Robert Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Blair v. Omaha, City of et al

as 8:2007cv00295
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Blair
Defendant:
Omaha, City of, Douglas County, Randy Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.