Cases 1 - 10 of 13
In re: Amarin Corp PLC
as 21-2071
Defendant / Appellee:
CRAIG B. GRANOWITZ, AMARIN CORPORATION PLC, JOHN THERO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEBENDRA SHARMA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner / Appellant:
CATHERINE LITTLE-HUNT, as Trustee of the Gaetano Cecchini Living Trust and DAN KOTECKI
Sabina v. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00860
Defendant:
Dayton Misfeldt, Steve R. Carchedi, David C. Stump and others
Plaintiff:
Chase Sabina
Kubicek v. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00710
Defendant:
Steve R. Carchedi, David C. Stump, Steven B. Ketchum and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kubicek
Rond v. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Dayton Misfeldt, Steve R. Carchedi, David C. Stump and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Rond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Wheeler v. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00511
Defendant:
Steve R. Carchedi, David C. Stump, Steven B. Ketchum and others
Plaintiff:
John Wheeler and Jacob Wheeler
Zivan v. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00478
Defendant:
Dayton Misfeldt, Steve R. Carchedi, David C. Stump and others
Plaintiff:
Grant Zivan
Ciccotelli v. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00406
Defendant:
Dayton Misfeldt, Steve R. Carchedi, David C. Stump and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Ciccotelli
Blomquist v. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Defendant:
Steve R. Carchedi, David C. Stump, Steven B. Ketchum and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Blomquist
Hajdini v. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00359
Defendant:
Dayton Misfeldt, Steve R. Carchedi, David C. Stump and others
Plaintiff:
Ramazan Hajdini
Mooney v. Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00182
Defendant:
Dayton Misfeldt, Steve R. Carchedi, David C. Stump and others
Plaintiff:
James Mooney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
