Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Steven Martin et al v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv02269
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MARTIN and DANETTE BILLS
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC a Delaware Limited Liability Company, DOES 1-10, inclusive and Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Petition to Quiet Title
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rodney Martin v. USA
as 22-1434
Petitioner / Appellant:
RODNEY STEVEN MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MILLER v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05405
Plaintiff:
Steven Martin Miller and STEVEN MARTIN MILLER STEVEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Collins
as 0:2022cv00872
Petitioner:
John Steven Martin
Respondent:
Brian Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00824
Plaintiff:
Steven Martin Miller
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Martin v. Menard, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00032
Plaintiff:
Steven Martin
Defendant:
Menard, Inc., Litex Industries, Ltd. and Woodard CM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smeaton v. Nelson
as 21-30140
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, H. S. Ott, Warden Federal Detention Center Oakdale and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith Smeaton
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
