Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wilson v. Executive Dir. of the Colorado Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2016cv02263
Petitioner:
Steven R. Wilson
Respondent:
Executive Dir. of the Colorado Dept. of Corrections and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Benton County Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv05142
Plaintiff:
Steven R Wilson, Jr
Defendant:
Benton County Corrections and Steven Keane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Benton County Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv05139
Plaintiff:
Steven R Wilson, Jr
Defendant:
Benton County Corrections, S Keane, Mailroom Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Benton County Corrections Medical Department et al
as 2:2013cv05134
Plaintiff:
Steven R Wilson, Jr
Defendant:
Benton County Corrections Medical Department, Benton County Mental Health Department, S Keane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Benton County Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv05119
Defendant:
Benton County Corrections, S Keene, Brooks Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Steven R Wilson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Ploughe
as 1:2013cv02574
Petitioner:
Steven R. Wilson
Respondent:
Pamela Ploughe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. Pamela Plough et al
as 1:2013cv00007
Petitioner:
Steven R. Wilson
Respondent:
Pamela Plough and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. Jenks et al
as 1:2012cv02495
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Wilson
Defendant:
Jeff L. Jenks, Thomas W. Sheely, Sex Offender Management Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Bezona, et al
as 12-1078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN R. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RYAN BEZONA, MATHIS and WAGNER
Wilson v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv02374
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Wilson
Defendant:
DOC Inmate Banking/Accounts and Aristede W. Zavaras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
