Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MATTHEWS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv09404
Plaintiff:
DONALD B. MATTHEWS and PATRICIA SUE MATTHEWS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TAC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farrar et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01854
Plaintiff:
Tenesha Farrar , Frances Alt , Heather Jean Amici and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Compaines, Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthews v. Pfizer
as 3:2016cv02119
Plaintiff:
Sue Matthews
Defendant:
Pfizer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2016md02691
Defendant:
Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Dennis Andrews, Amador Herrara, Lyle Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson & Johnson, et al v. Tenesha Ferrar, et al
as 15-8019
Respondent:
Tenesha Ferrar, Frances Alt, Heather Amici and others
Petitioner:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc., formerly known as Luzenac America, Inc.
Matthews v. Pfizer
as 2:2015cv00740
Plaintiff:
Sue Matthews
Defendant:
Pfizer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrar et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tenesha Ferrar , Frances Alt , Heather Amici and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farrar et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2014cv01933
Plaintiff:
Tenesha Farrar , Frances Alt , Heather Jean Amici and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
