Cases 11 - 20 of 282
Cline v. Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), et al
as 22-7017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PERRY CLINE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
SUNOCO, INC. (R&M) and SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & TERMINALS L.P.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Taylor v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Hugh A. Taylor
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Marathon Petroleum Company LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
In re: Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), et al
as 21-7063
Petitioner:
In re: SUNOCO, INC. (R&M), NKA Sunoco (R&M), LLC and SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & TERMINALS L.P.
Respondent:
PERRY CLINE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
ETC Sunoco Holdings v. USA
as 21-10937
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ETC Sunoco Holdings, L.L.C., formerly known as Sunoco, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Herron v. Sunoco Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01723
Defendant:
Sunoco Inc and MDC Coast II LLC
Plaintiff:
Matthew T Herron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Herron v. Sunoco Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01722
Defendant:
Sunoco Inc and MDC Coast II LLC
Plaintiff:
Robin Herron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nobili v. Chevron USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00022
Defendant:
Williams Olefins LLC, Pharmacia Corp., South Hampton Refining, Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Donnamarie Nobili
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01512
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Cline, et al v. Sunoco (R&M)
as 20-7072
Defendant / Appellant:
SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & TERMINALS L.P. and SUNOCO, INC. (R&M)
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PERRY CLINE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
