Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Carrasco v. Griffin
as 23-611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose E. Carrasco
Defendant / Appellee:
Superintendent Thomas Griffin
Defendant:
Comm. A. Annucci, Lt. W. Plimley, C.O. M. Ernst and others
Black v. Griffin
as 19-2122
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Thomas Griffin
Petitioner / Appellant:
Raphael Black
Ward v. Annucci et al
as 1:2019cv04759
Defendant:
David J. Howard, Frederick N. Bernstein, Donald Wilkins and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pleasant v. Griffin
as 1:2018cv10319
Respondent:
Superintendent Thomas Griffin
Petitioner:
Joseph Pleasant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baptiste v. Griffin et al
as 7:2018cv07274
Defendant:
Cocuzza, Correctional Officer Michael T. Nagy and Superintendent Thomas Griffin
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Baptiste
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Department of Correctional and
as 18-2052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James E. Fox
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent Thomas Griffin, Superintendent Jeffrey Tedford, Probation Officer Pete Sigler and others
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Board of Parole Counsels Office, Eastern Correctional Facility, Adirondack Correctional Facility and others
Renaud v. Griffin
as 1:2017cv02469
Respondent:
Superintendent Thomas Griffin
Petitioner:
Stephen Renaud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fox v. New York State Department of C
as 17-570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James E. Fox
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Board of Parole Counsels Office, Eastern Correctional Facility, Superintendent Thomas Griffin and others
Brown v. Griffin
as 16-3165
Petitioner - Appellant:
Kennedy Brown
Respondent - Appellee:
Superintendent Thomas Griffin, Southport Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
