Cases 1 - 10 of 4,527
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Berckmann (PS) v. Executive Director CDOC et al
as 1:2024cv01101
Petitioner:
Jon Berckmann
Respondent:
Executive Director CDOC, Colorado Supreme Court, Phillip Weiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maqbool v. Louisiana Supreme Court Committee on Bar Admissions
as 2:2024cv00976
Plaintiff:
Mubashir Maqbool
Defendant:
Louisiana Supreme Court Committee on Bar Admissions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reevis v. Spokane County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Spokane County Superior Court, US District Court, US Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. California Supreme Court
as 24-2381
Plaintiff:
MYEISHA M. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT
McGore v. Hood et al
as 2:2024cv10999
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore
Defendant:
Denise Hood, United States Supreme Court, US Congress and others
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 24-954
Plaintiff:
NELLA MANKO
Defendant:
LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, DANA A. MANNOR, M.D., NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
Emrit et al v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segreated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America
Defendant:
Hon. John Roberts, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Justice Samuel Alito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
