Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ornelas v. Steel
as 9:2018cv00133
Defendant:
Susan A Steel
Plaintiff:
Juan Javier Ornelas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Rikers Island Warden et al
as 9:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bell
Defendant:
Rikers Island Warden, Blaines Court, Warden Bruce A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ornelas v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2017cv03861
Plaintiff:
Juan Javier Ornelas
Defendant:
Alexander Hamilton, Benny H. Boykin, Lonnie E. Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Rikers Island Warden et al
as 1:2017cv07192
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bell
Defendant:
Blaines Court, Beth Pipkens, Kelly D. Prater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARABALLO v. GREWAL et al
as 2:2017cv00787
Petitioner:
LUIS CARABALLO
Respondent:
GURBIR S. GREWAL , ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY , STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RANKO v. SAUDINO
as 2:2015cv08483
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED K. RANKO
Defendant:
MICHAEL SAUDINO, LILIANA S. DEAVILA-SILEBI, SUSAN J. STEELE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steel v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06544
Plaintiff:
Susan D. Steel
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Steel v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02898
Plaintiff:
Susan M Steel
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Depuy and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steel v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Susan M Steel
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steele et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02833
Plaintiff:
Susan Lynn Steele and Jackie Steele
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
