Cases 1 - 10 of 16
B. et al v. Romero et al
as 1:2022cv11851
Plaintiff:
F. B. and G. G.
Defendant:
Melvis C. Romero, Massachusetts Department of Corrections, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B. et al v. Romero et al
as 1:2022cv11849
Plaintiff:
F. B., G. G. and Kristie Ladouceur
Defendant:
Melvis C. Romero, Department of Corrections of Massachusetts, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. CCS Well Path, et al
as 22-1179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TACOMA DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee:
CCS WELL PATH and DESPINA KIELY
Defendant:
MARK FOGAREN, ICG Correctional Officer, JOSE VARELA, Correctional Officer, TODD BAPTISTA, Correctional Officer and others
Daniels v. Varela, et al
as 21-1740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TACOMA DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSE VARELA, Correctional Officer, TODD BAPTISTA, Lieutenant, PETER PASCUCCI, Captian and others
Defendant:
MARK FOGAREN, ICG Correctional Officer, CCS WELL PATH and DESPINA KIELY
Daniels v. Varela, et al
as 20-2104
Defendant / Appellee:
SUZANNE THIBAULT, Superintendent, TODD BAPTISTA, Correctional Officer, JOSE VARELA, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TACOMA DANIELS
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARRETSON, Correctional Officer
Bonnett v. Thibault
as 1:2020cv11563
Respondent:
Suzanne Thibault
Petitioner:
Darkens Bonnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. Thibault
as 1:2020cv10354
Petitioner:
Herdius Evans
Respondent:
Suzanne Thibault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ware v. Thibault
as 1:2020cv10016
Petitioner:
James Ware and Herdius Evans
Respondent:
Suzanne Thibault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Turco et al
as 1:2019cv11807
Defendant:
Mark Fogeran, Karen Collins, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Da'Shawn Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Riley et al
as 1:2019cv11545
Defendant:
Joshua Macy, Geralyn Riley, Jaileen Hopkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
