Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3729
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00057
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vertison v. American Snuff Company, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00118
Plaintiff: Rosie Vertison
Defendant: American Snuff Company, LLC, Swedish Match North America, Inc. and Smokeless Tobacco Council, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00064
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Corona Cigar Company v. Cigars International, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00747
Plaintiff: Corona Cigar Company and Corona Cigar Company
Defendant: Cigars International, Inc., Keith Meier, Swedish Match North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Altadis USA, Inc. et al v. Prince George's County, MD et al
as 8:2008cv03492
Plaintiff: Altadis USA, Inc., Altadis USA, Inc., John Middleton Co. and others
Defendant: Prince George's County, MD and Jack B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Swedish Match North America, Inc. v. Hall et al
as 3:2008cv00596
Plaintiff: Swedish Match North America, Inc.
Defendant: Eric Hall, Juanita Tucker and Mary November
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Swedish Match N Amer v. US Smokeless Tobacco, et al
as 4:2002cv00141
Plaintiff: Swedish Match North America, Inc.
Defendant: U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company, U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Manufacturing Limited Partnership, U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?