Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv09356
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, Subscribing to Policy No. B0509B0WCN1500017, McKesson Corporation, Liberty Special Markets Agency
and others
Plaintiff:
Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 8:2020cv02268
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON, SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. 509/DL554610, McKesson Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company
and others
Plaintiff:
Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Account Receivable
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Dickstein Shapiro LLP, et al
as 19-56102
Defendant / Appellant:
SWISS RE INTERNATIONAL SE ZURICH, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, including Brit UW Limited for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2987, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2623, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 0623, Faraday, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 2:2019cv07730
Plaintiff:
Swiss RE International SE, Lexington Insurance Company, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON
and others
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Insurance Contract
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Dickstein Shapiro LLP, et al
as 19-56027
Defendant / Appellee:
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, including Brit UW Limited for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2987, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2623, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 0623, Faraday, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Dickstein Shapiro LLP, et al
as 19-55502
Defendant / Appellee:
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, including Brit UW Limited for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2987, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2623, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 0623, Faraday, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Dickstein Shapiro LLP et al
as 2:2018cv02893
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, including Brit UW Limited for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2987, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2623, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. fo, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, including Brit UW Limited for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2987, Beazley Staff Underwriting Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2623, Beazley Underw, Dickstein Shapiro LLP
and others
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. v. Global Aerospace, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01515
Plaintiff:
Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Aerospace, Inc. , Great Lakes Insurance SE (Germany) , Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co. of America
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. f/k/a Aerojet-General Corporation v. Global Aerospace, Inc. et al
as 2:2017at00728
Plaintiff:
Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. f/k/a Aerojet-General Corporation
Defendant:
Global Aerospace, Inc. , Great Lakes Insurance SE (Germany) f/k/a Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE f/k/a Great Lakes Reinsurance UK Plc, Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co. of America
and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
SFA Group, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd', et al
as 16-56467
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SFA GROUP, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON, CERTAIN LONDON MARKET COMPANIES, LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 2987
and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
