Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Syliva Thomas et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04508
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Thomas and Danny Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Towler et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 7:2021cv03095
Plaintiff:
Natalia Towler and Sylvia Thomas
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caplan v. PROGRESSIVE HEALING STORES, L.L.C. et al
as 0:2019cv60479
Defendant:
SYLVIA THOMAS, JEFFREY L. THOMAS and PROGRESSIVE HEALING STORES, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Thomas et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv13635
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Thomas and Danny Thomas
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv01538
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Thomas
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. USA
as 1:2014cv00497
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sylvia Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Sylvia Thoma
as 13-3774
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SYLVIA THOMAS
Thomas v. United Air Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00745
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Thomas
Defendant:
United Air Lines, Inc. and Rafael Padilla Cruz
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1471
WATTERS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al
as 2:2012cv04159
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. WATTERS , CATHERINA WATTERS , JOSEPH E. JACOBY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
