Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Goldsmith v. Syracuse University
as 5:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Goldsmith
Defendant:
Syracuse University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Kearns v. Wallin et al
as 5:2023cv01500
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kearns
Defendant:
Theodore O. Wallin and Syracuse University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
John Doe v. Syracuse University
as 5:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Syracuse University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Doe v. Sigma Chi International Fraternity, Incorporated et al
as 5:2023cv01452
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Sigma Chi International Fraternity, Incorporated, Luke Rogers, Ethan Hirsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
May et al v. Syracuse University
as 5:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Scott May, Timothy DeSanto, Robert Druger and others
Defendant:
Syracuse University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Williams v. Syracuse University et al
as 5:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Brandon Williams
Defendant:
Syracuse University, Board of Trustees of Syracuse University, Robert Hradsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2674
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
