Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Blount v. Major, et al
as 4:2015cv00322
Plaintiff:
James P. Blount
Defendant:
Keith S. Major , Nicholas R. Shelton , Erich J. Vonnida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Burl et al
as 2:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Anthony Washington
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Todd Ball, David Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cody v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv02031
Plaintiff:
Terrence T. Cody
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Charles Ford, Etta Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cody v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00383
Plaintiff:
Terrence T. Cody
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Charles Ford, Etta Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Cody et al
as 2:2012cv00198
Plaintiff:
Gregory A McElroy
Defendant:
T Cody, L Ester, Danny Burl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Hughes et al
as 2:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
Corey D Perkins
Defendant:
Joe Hughes, Katherine James, R T Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Franklin v. T. Cody, et al
as 10-1859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank Lee Franklin
Defendant - Appellee:
T. Cody, Disciplinary Notification Officer, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Lathan Ester, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
Franklin v. Cody et al
as 2:2009cv00161
Plaintiff:
Frank Lee Franklin
Defendant:
T Cody, Lathan Ester, Greg Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway v. Norris et al
as 2:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
Kareem Holloway
Defendant:
Larry Norris, James Gibson, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
