Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Gyden v. Dixson et al
as 8:2022cv02980
Plaintiff:
Bernard E. Gyden
Defendant:
Rick Dixson, T. Bowden and Sabatier Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christensen v. Bowden et al
as 3:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Dennis Christensen
Defendant:
T. Bowden, C. Underhill, Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHARLES v. PITTMAN et al
as 3:2022cv10106
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MACK CHARLES
Defendant:
P A PITTMAN, S CARROLL, S G MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-15181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gernard D. ChestnutIn re: Gernard D. Chestnut
as 21-14488
Petitioner:
In re: GERNARD CHESTNUT
Respondent:
SANTA ROSA CI WARDEN, J. NEEL, Lieutenant, HUGHES, Lieutenant and others
MURRAY v. MAIORANA et al

as 3:2021cv03545
Plaintiff:
HENRY LEE MURRAY, JR
Defendant:
C MAIORANA, C COOPER, GARY ENGLISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 4:2021cv08945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracy Freeman v. T. Bowden, et al
as 21-13255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACY FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
T. BOWDEN, Secretary Representative, in individual and official capacities, R. BRYNER, Warden Martin Correctional Institution, in individual capacity, J. HOLTZ, Warden Martin Correctional Institution, in individual capacity and others
CADEJUSTE v. INCH et al

as 4:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
MARCO THONY CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
MARK INCH, H WELLS and WARDEN T BOWDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.