Cases 1 - 10 of 189
Benjamin Collins v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1155
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN T. COLLINS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Collins (PS) v. Warden of Teller County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv03295
Petitioner:
Benjamin T. Collins
Respondent:
Warden of Teller County Jail and Jason Mikesell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
as 1:2023cv01377
Plaintiff:
Deijohn Washington
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union and John T. Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
COLLINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12492
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T COLLINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALLEN v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND ALLEN
Defendant:
OFFICER T COLLINS, OFFICER C LA CHANCE and OFFICER SGT SURO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Gregory et al
as 1:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Javon Lamaar Curtis
Defendant:
Alicia A. Gregory, T. Collins and Nabi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
COLLINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10383
Plaintiff:
JASON T COLLINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States v. Izeall Collins
as 23-1055
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Izeall T. Collins
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2023cv05021
Plaintiff:
scott collins and Scott T Collins
Defendant:
Brian Smith, Carla Jacobi, Nathan West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv05022
Plaintiff:
Scott T Collins
Defendant:
Brian Smith, Carla Jacobi, Nathan West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
