Cases 1 - 10 of 289
Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00289
Plaintiff:
Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., Sprint LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Arlington Technologies LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00279
Plaintiff:
Arlington Technologies LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA Inc, Sprint LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jaiyeola v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 25-1380
Plaintiff:
GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA
Defendant:
AT&T INC., T-MOBILE US, INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Beets v. T-Mobile US Inc
as 2:2025cv00335
Plaintiff:
Carrie Beets
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Roth v. Deutsche Telekom AG et al
as 1:2025cv01137
Plaintiff:
Andrew E. Roth
Defendant:
Deutsche Telekom AG, Deutsche Telekom Holding B.V. and T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv13131
Defendant:
Crown Castle LLC and T-Mobile US, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Town Residences LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Unimax Communications, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
as 24-6871
Plaintiff:
UNIMAX COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC.
Nejad v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-6707
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHAHROKH SAADAT NEJAD, AKA, Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad; AKA, Shahrokh Saadat Nejad; AKA, Shahrokh S. Nejad; AKA, Shahrokh Saadat; AKA, Shahrokh Nejad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv07590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
T-Mobile US, Inc. v. Kaifi LLC
as 25-1006
Defendant:
KAIFI LLC
Plaintiff:
T-MOBILE US, INC. and T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
