Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hernandez v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Joahn Alexander Hernandez
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc., Kaythlen Doe, Angel Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Pricharda v. Havas Street et al
as 5:2022cv03061
Plaintiff:
Michael Pricharda
Defendant:
Havas Street and T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
FALLIS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FALLIS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
7601 CASTOR AVE LLC v. T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC, et al
as 2:2022cv00623
Plaintiff:
7601 CASTOR AVE LLC
Defendant:
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC and T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 2:2021cv03006
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0151
Kesler v. T-MOBILE USA, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02516
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, T-MOBILE USA, INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Plaintiff:
Sima Kesler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MERCER v. T-MOBILE, USA, INC.
as 2:2020cv05994
Plaintiff:
CANDACE MERCER
Defendant:
T-MOBILE, USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
