Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Huffman v. Garrett
as 7:2024cv00647
Defendant:
Brady T. Garrett
Plaintiff:
Jullian A. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02189
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dumas v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Dumas
Defendant:
T. Garrett, K. LeGrand and Venus Fajota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Garrett v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Shirley T. Garrett
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Petras v. Gittere et al
as 2:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Petras
Defendant:
William Gittere, J. Chacon, Hultenschmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemens v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Dave Clemens
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, K. LeGrand and T. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. The State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Brett Doyle
Defendant:
The State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, Scott Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayvell Vann v. Warden Entzel, et al
as 22-3204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYVELL VANN
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ENTZEL, T. GARRETT, Officer, WARDEN SEGAL and others
Hendrix v. LeGrand et al
as 2:2022cv01402
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, John Henley, Curtis Rigner and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
