Cases 41 - 50 of 51
(PC)Evans v. Sherman et al
as 1:2019cv00760
Defendant:
S. Sherman, J. Moore, K. Huffman and others
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Evans v. Sherman et al
as 1:2019cv00226
Defendant:
S. Sherman, Figeroa, T. Cisneros and others
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman et al
as 2:2019cv00246
Defendant:
S. Magnia, K. Rening, A. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman et al
as 1:2019cv00225
Defendant:
S. Magnia, K. Rening, A. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Dominguez v. Padilla et al
as 1:2018cv01731
Defendant:
Kathleen Alison, Stu Sherman, A. Oregel and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamisi Calloway v. CDCR, et al
as 17-17474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, T. PEREZ and others
Calloway v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016cv01305
Plaintiff:
Jamisi Jermaine Calloway
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, C. Gipson, T. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. Cisneros
as 1:2015cv01141
Plaintiff:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Andrea T. Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Carranza et al v. Cate et al
as 4:2013cv03337
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Carranza, P. T. Smith and E. E. Hough
Defendant:
Mathew Cate, Craig Lewis, K. Cruse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Cate et al
as 1:2010cv01509
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Martin
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Derral G. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
