Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Sanchez v. Cisneros et al
as 3:2022cv01159
Petitioner:
Josue Israel Sanchez
Respondent:
T. Cisneros and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) McKenna v. Cisneros et al
as 2:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
Edward Phillip McKenna
Defendant:
T. Cisneros, Warden CSP-Corcoran, Warden Mule Creek State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Taylor v. Cisneros
as 2:2022cv01114
Petitioner:
Dezestia Shane Taylor
Respondent:
T. Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Barrientos v. T. Cisneros
as 2:2022cv03867
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Barrientos
Respondent:
T. Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Tapia v. Cisneros
as 3:2022cv00283
Petitioner:
Jaime G. Tapia
Respondent:
T. Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Tapia v. Cisneros
as 1:2022cv00243
Petitioner:
Jaime G. Tapia
Respondent:
T. Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Senator v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Bruce Richard Senator
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Joseph Bick, T. Cisneros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Castro v. Cisneros
as 2:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Salvador A. Castro and Salvador Alexander Castro
Respondent:
T. Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Porter v. Rivas et al
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Larry James Porter
Defendant:
O. Rivas and T. Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hadley v. Mendes et al
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Hadley
Defendant:
S. Mendes, C. Delacruz and T. Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.