Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mehta v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
Rukminesh Mehta
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Maggie J. Kuhl, The Kuhl Law Office, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01498
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Axtell v. Palomo et al
as 1:2021cv00291
Defendant:
Austyn Onstott, V. Harrel, M. Deleon and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Axtell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RP Golden State Management, LLC et al v. Boyle et al
as 1:2020cv01479
Plaintiff:
RP Golden State Management, LLC, Asha Desai and Paul Desai
Defendant:
JonesTurner Law, Stephen H. Boyle, Hinshaw & Culberston LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clifford v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv50127
Plaintiff:
John T. Clifford
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Evans et al
as 1:2013cv01937
Plaintiff:
Rita King
Defendant:
Glenn Evans, City Of Chicago, D T Clifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLIFFORD v. BANK OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv07796
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
EDWARD T. CLIFFORD, III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CLIFFORD v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv87364
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. CLIFFORD
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC., THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, FIBREBOARD CORP. (PABCO) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Keith Ellis, et al v. USA, et al
as 09-2181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH ELLIS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARVIN HOLLAND, ANTWON ROGERS, SIDDIQ A. HAMID and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES F. SHERMAN, GARY GRIMM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
