Cases 1 - 10 of 475
Tizeno v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
Candi Tizeno
Defendant:
Jose T. Gonzales, Jr., Driver Pipeline Co. and AIG Property Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tizeno v. Driver Pipeline Co et al
as 6:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
Candi Tizeno
Defendant:
Driver Pipeline Co, A I G Property Casualty Co, Jose T Gonzales, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
(PC) Sloan v. Cisneros et al
as 1:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Sloan, Jr.
Defendant:
T. Cisneros, P. Llamas, S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Corey T. Gonzales
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(PC) Riddell v. Frye et al
as 1:2021cv01065
Plaintiff:
David W. Riddell
Defendant:
Officer Frye, V. Coy, G. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Riddell v. Frye et al
as 2:2021cv01188
Plaintiff:
David W. Riddell
Defendant:
Officer Frye, V. Coy, G. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93256
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN T GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00102
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HAMILTON v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2018cv01158
Defendant:
WENDY POHLHAUS, LESLIE PARSONS, CHANNING PHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Troy Anderson v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 17-16420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY J. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., for the State of California, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
