Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Holden v. Union Pacific Railroad Co et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Holden and Edward T Holden
Defendant:
Thomas Robinson, Jr., Horace Martin, Walter Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Holden v. Donaldson et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Holden
Defendant:
D. Donaldson, Sr., Nurse K. Coleman, WCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Union Pacific Railroad Co v. Edward T Holden
as 5:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Co
Defendant:
Edward T. Holden and Edward T Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
HOLDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64131
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHELTON T HOLDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Holden
as 5:2020ct03156
Plaintiff:
Bryan James
Defendant:
Sgt. T. Holden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #146246 v. Schmaker et al
as 1:2019cv00195
Defendant:
Unknown Hainstock, Anita Young, B. Topping and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Jones #146246
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Corbin
as 3:2018cv01587
Plaintiff:
Deon C. Parker, Dustin C. Burton, Jeremiah M. Bennett and others
Defendant:
Todd Corbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holden v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02505
Plaintiff:
Shirley T. Holden
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Derrick Holden
as 17-30101
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DERRICK HOLDEN, also known as D-Lo, also known as Terrance T. Holden
USA v. Curtis Holden
as 13-30308
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS T. HOLDEN, DBA Advanced Podiatry Specialists PS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
