Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Bryan Jones v. Warden, et al
as 23-10285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN L. VIZION JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, GD & CP, JOSEPH P. FOWLKES, GD & CP, FOGUM, GD & CP and others
Nathaniel Gann v. Valley State Prison, et al
as 22-16862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN
Defendant / Appellee:
VALLEY STATE PRISON, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATEWIDE RELIGIOUS REVIEW COMMITTEE, J. KNIGHT, Appeals Examiner at the Office of Appeals (CDCR) and others
THORNTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv20022
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCY T THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Marroquin v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00032
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rodolfo Marroquin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Schockner v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Manfred Schockner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Prier v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Jeramie Prier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Weston v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00025
Plaintiff:
John F. Weston
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Boyce v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Eugene Boyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Morgan v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wilke Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Warzek v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Warzek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
