Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Bryan Jones v. Warden, et al
as 23-10285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN L. VIZION JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, GD & CP, JOSEPH P. FOWLKES, GD & CP, FOGUM, GD & CP and others
Nathaniel Gann v. Valley State Prison, et al
as 22-16862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN
Defendant / Appellee:
VALLEY STATE PRISON, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATEWIDE RELIGIOUS REVIEW COMMITTEE, J. KNIGHT, Appeals Examiner at the Office of Appeals (CDCR) and others
(PC) Zelaya v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00033
Plaintiff:
Oscar Zelaya
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Phillips v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00022
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ebel v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Vladimir R. Ebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Fox v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Michael Joseph Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Thomas v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Hiram Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Marroquin v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00032
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rodolfo Marroquin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Prier v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Jeramie Prier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Schockner v. Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Paez, Raythel Fisher, Jr., Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Manfred Schockner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
