Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Kalvin Washington v. Paul Walton, et al
as 22-1896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KALVIN LAMAR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL T. WALTON and TRINIDAD PAREDES
Washington v. Walton et al
as 1:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Lamar Washington #493833
Defendant:
Paul T. Walton, Trinidad Paredes #801326, Matthew Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Neal C. Townsend and Neal Townsend
Defendant:
McClenny, Moseley & Associates, PLLC, McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC, James M. McClenny and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Townsend Law, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Law Offices of Daniel R. Sanders LLC and Daniel R Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Washington v. Walton et al
as 2:2022cv11316
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Lamar Washington
Defendant:
Paul T. Walton and Trinidad Paredes
Kalvin Washington v. Richard Sanchez, et al
as 21-1735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KALVIN LAMAR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD SANCHEZ, SUZANNE STRAUTZ, OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR and others
WALTON v. USA
as 1:2019cv02474
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
REGINALD T. WALTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walton v. Dozer et al
as 1:2019cv00063
Defendant:
C/O II Cain, Murphy, Reed L. and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio T. Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: ESTATE OF JOHN T. WALTON
as 2:2019cv01851
In Re:
ESTATE OF JOHN T. WALTON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2710
Walton v. Warden
as 1:2019cv00027
Petitioner:
Antonio Walton and Antonio T. Walton
Respondent:
Warden and Edward Philbin
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nolan-Bey v. McPherson County Court et al
as 6:2017cv01278
Plaintiff:
Marques Nolan-Bey
Defendant:
McPherson County Court, Richard B. Walker, David Page and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
