Cases 1 - 10 of 37
(PC)Tsetse v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Prince Franklin Tsetse
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ramirez v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, E. McDaniel, Mehta Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric L. Wright v. Tammy Campbel
as 2:2024cv01658
Petitioner:
Eric L Wright
Respondent:
Tammy Campbel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Tran v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Huy Trong Tran
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ismail Mora v. E. Sanchez et al
as 2:2023cv09635
Plaintiff:
Ismail Mora
Defendant:
E. Sanchez, R. Roque, B. Garfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacuan v. Campbell
as 3:2023cv01844
Petitioner:
Leopoldo Pacuan
Respondent:
Tammy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Ngo v. Campbell et al
as 1:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
My Ngo
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, Galvin Newsom, Appellate Defenders Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saul Miranda Ramirez v. Danial Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv07576
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Warden Danial Samuel, Associate Warden B.D. Phillips, Correctional Officer C. Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Arellano v. CAL PIA et al
as 1:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Bobby Arellano
Defendant:
CAL PIA, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Tammy Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hill v. Campbell et al
as 1:2023cv01103
Plaintiff:
Tony Hill
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, T. Cisneros, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
