Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-950
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Digrigoli et al v. TD Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
Matteo Digrigoli and Lindsay Jacob
Defendant:
TD Bank, N.A., Jenai R. Lluvera, Alexis Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Baker Botts L.L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv02008
Plaintiff:
Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo
Defendant:
Baker Botts L.L.P., Richard B. Harper, Esq., Robert Lawrence Mairer, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reynolds v. Scotttrade, Inc./TD Ameritrade, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Atrella R Reynolds
Defendant:
Scotttrade, Inc./TD Ameritrade, Inc., Toronto-Dominion Bank doing business as TD Bank, N.A. doing business as TD Ameritrade, Charles Schwab Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
