Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lawrence v. Demings
as 6:2014cv01352
Plaintiff:
Noel Lawrence , Clair Terborg , Jean Choisil and others
Defendant:
Jerry Demings, Ken Lawson, Travis Leslie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00208
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marietta Sampson, et al v. City of Brunswick, et al
as 13-11374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIETTA SAMPSON, OSCAR MANGRAM, ERNEST FULLER, III and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES JORDAN and MIKE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BRUNSWICK, GLYNN COUNTY, GEORGIA, SHAUN T. JOHNSON and others
Berry et al v. Orange County et al
as 6:2011cv01740
Plaintiff:
Brian Berry , Jermario Anderson , Reginald Trammon and others
Defendant:
Orange County , Jerry Demings, Ken Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saloum v. Wright et al
as 3:2011cv00900
Defendant:
City of Tillamook and Terry Wright
Plaintiff:
Harvey Saloum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-16528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sampson et al v. Fuller et al
as 2:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Marietta Sampson , Oscar Mangram , Ernest Fuller , III and others
Defendant:
City of Brunswick, Glynn County, Georgia, Shaun T. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rangel et al v. Forsyth County et al
as 2:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Sallie Ann Rangel and Sergio Rangel
Defendant:
Forsyth County, Forsyth County, Ted Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rangel et al v. Forsyth County et al
as 2:2007cv00142
Plaintiff:
Sallie Ann Rangel and Sergio Rangel
Defendant:
Forsyth County, Ted Paxton, Terri Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
