Cases 1 - 10 of 3,918
Halman Aldubi Provident and Pension Funds Ltd v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, et al
as 23-8050
Respondent:
GERALD FORSYTHE and ELI KALIF
Petitioner:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD, EREZ VIGODMAN, EYAL DESHEH and others
UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10030
Plaintiff:
UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund, UFOA FAMILY PROTECTION PLAN LOCAL 854, UFOA FOR RETIRED FIRE OFFICERS FAMILY PROTECTION PLAN and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd., Psagot Provident Funds & Pension Ltd., Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Erez Vigodman and others
FWK HOLDINGS, LLC. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02958
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02960
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff:
MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Interested Party:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C. v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02956
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff:
MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Utah-Idaho Teamsters Security Fund v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv11198
Plaintiff:
Utah-Idaho Teamsters Security Fund
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Iron Workers District Council of New England Health and Welfare Fund v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv11131
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers District Council of New England Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
RDC LIQUIDATING TRUST BY AND THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE, ADVISORY TRUST GROUP LLC et al v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
RDC LIQUIDATING TRUST BY AND THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE, ADVISORY TRUST GROUP LLC, MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
