Cases 21 - 30 of 10,757
Little v. Lumpkin
as 24-10121
Petitioner:
Paul La'Mark Little
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Pacheco-Morales v. Collier
as 24-40050
Plaintiff:
Hector Pacheco-Morales
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division, Don Briscoe, FNU Norsworthy, Senior Warden and others
Busby v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Busby
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 24-10244
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mitchell v. Lumpkin
as 24-10250
Petitioner:
Darrell Boyd Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tipton v. Rayford
as 24-50214
Plaintiff:
Charlton Reed Tipton
Defendant:
Phonso Rayford, Christopher Pauley, Captain, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ruth E. Trice, Captain of Correctional Officers and others
McCoy v. Lumpkin
as 24-40185
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bonner v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pearson v. Lumpkin
as 24-20112
Petitioner:
Donnie Ray Pearson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rubio v. Lumpkin
as 24-50203
Petitioner:
Juan Rubio
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
