Cases 21 - 30 of 1,349
Tucker v. Lumpkin
as 21-40894
Petitioner / Appellant:
Brian Allen Tucker
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Sorrow v. Linthicum
as 21-40897
Defendant / Appellee:
Lannette Linthicum, Medical Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ben Raimer and others
Appellant:
Loyd Landon Sorrow
Miller v. Lumpkin
as 21-11207
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joshua Thomas Miller
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Canales v. Lumpkin
as 21-51167
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ramiro Canales
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Pipes v. Lumpkin
as 21-20635
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Levi Pipes
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Peters v. TDCJ
as 21-40881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin and State of Texas
Graves v. Lumpkin
as 21-20633
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lawrence Graves
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cano v. Lumpkin
as 21-11176
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Daniel Cano
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Vega v. Lumpkin
as 21-20621
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Efrain Vega
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Sanders v. Lumpkin
as 21-20622
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Morris Sanders
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
