Cases 41 - 50 of 10,791
Gibson v. Lumpkin
as 24-10184
Petitioner:
Scottie H. Gibson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, r, State of Texas 413th Judicial District of Johnson County, State of Texas 249th Judicial District Court of Johnson County and others
Gryder v. TDCJ-CID
as 24-40130
Plaintiff:
James Gryder
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID and Donald Muniz, Warden, Eastham Unit - Texas Department of Criminal Justice; Correctional Institutional Division
Roy v. Lumpkin
as 24-40116
Petitioner:
Alex Joseph Roy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Thompson v. Lumpkin
as 24-20078
Petitioner:
Overille Denton Thompson, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Brown v. Lumpkin
as 24-20080
Petitioner:
Darrel Wayne Brown
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
White v. Lumpkin
as 24-40119
Petitioner:
William Dexter White
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Albarado v. Lumpkin
as 24-10163
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Albarado
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
In re: Ivan Cantu
as 24-40110
Petitioner:
In re: Ivan Abner Cantu
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Lewis v. Lumpkin
as 24-50115
Petitioner:
Billy Wayne Lewis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
