Cases 41 - 50 of 224
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-50713
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anthony Williams v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 18-20584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY CORDELL WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, Attorney General of the State of Texas, JUDGE JIM WALLACE, 263rd Judicial District Criminal Trial Court, ROLANDO PABLOS, Secretary of the State of Texas and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Bailey, et al v. Bryan Collier, Exct Dir TDCJ, et al
as 18-20419
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ROBERT M. HERRERA and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Appellant:
ANTWAIN BURKS
David Bailey v. Bryan Collier, Executive Dir, et al
as 18-20401
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ROBERTO M. HERRERA and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Interested Party - Appellant:
RAYMOND TORRES
David Bailey v. Bryan Collier, Executive Dir, et al
as 18-20402
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ROBERTO M. HERRERA and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Movant - Appellant:
JAMES A. MEEKS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
