Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER, DCH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, SONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Health and Heart Vascular Hospital Arlington et al v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 4:2020cv00325
Plaintiff:
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Plano, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Hurst-Euless-Bedford and others
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Texas Health and Heart Vascular Hospital Arlington et al v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Plano, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Hurst-Euless-Bedford and others
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue and Health Care Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Devabhaktuni v. Fish et al
as 3:2019cv02644
Defendant:
Medical City of Denton, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospitals Plano, Medical City of Dallas and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Strong v. Texas Health Resources et al
as 4:2019cv00661
Plaintiff:
William Strong
Defendant:
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Plano and Texas Health Resources
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Machock v. Medicredit Inc et al
as 3:2019cv01789
Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Plano, Medicredit and others
Plaintiff:
James Machock
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FLOWER HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR
as 1:2019cv01046
Plaintiff:
MEDICAL CENTER OF LOUISIANA AT NEW ORLEANS, E.A. CONWAY MEDICAL CENTER, BAY PARK COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
