Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BURRUS v. THE KROGER CO.
as 1:2020cv00411
Defendant:
THE KROGER CO.
Plaintiff:
MALIKKAH SHERAE BURRUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEYSEN v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 1:2020cv00183
Defendant:
ASSOCIATED PHARMACIES, INC., BEVERLY SACKLER, MALLINCKRODT, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Patty Carol Leysen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ligon v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 5:2018cv00605
Plaintiff:
Michael Ligon
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIDSON COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00983
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., MALLINCKRODT LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVIDSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robeson County v. Actavis, LLC et al
as 7:2018cv00163
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, MALLINCKRODT, LLC, H. D. SMITH, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robeson County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Iredell County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 5:2018cv00090
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Iredell County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CABARRUS COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00474
Plaintiff:
CABARRUS COUNTY
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., PURDUE PHARMA INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 5:2017cv00588
Plaintiff:
Joanne Allen
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CHURCH v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I et al
as 1:2014cv01019
Plaintiff:
CONNIE CHURCH
Defendant:
KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I , THE KROGER CO. and KROGER CO. FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
