Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DIXON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05397
Plaintiff: RANDY DIXON
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WARDEN (C.F.C.F.), DEPUTY WARDEN (C.F.C.F.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv05654
Plaintiff: LEROY JACKSON
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE COMMISSIONER OF PHILADLEPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, THE WARDEN C.F.C.F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLOWAY v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2011cv07892
Plaintiff: ZACHARY HOLLOWAY
Defendant: CITY OF PHILA, GIORLA, JANE/JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMUELS v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2011cv05420
Plaintiff: DUSTIN SAMUELS
Defendant: CITY OF PHILA., GIORLA, DEP. COM. JANE/JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PACELL v. PHILA et al
as 2:2011cv04350
Plaintiff: FREDERICK PACELL
Defendant: PHILA, CONTRY PRISON, C.F.C.F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SURDEN/ SEGARS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv04186
Plaintiff: GREG SURDEN/ SEGARS
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM, GIORIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS v. DELANEY WARDEN/C.F.C.F.
as 2:2010cv02981
Plaintiff: JOSE RAMOS
Defendant: DELANEY WARDEN/C.F.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. WARDEN C.F.C.F
as 2:2010cv02547
Plaintiff: GEORGE JONES
Defendant: WARDEN C.F.C.F
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS v. (DELANEY WARDEN)/C.F.C.F
as 2:2010cv02332
Plaintiff: JOSE RAMOS
Defendant: (DELANEY WARDEN)/C.F.C.F
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. WARDEN - C.F.C.F. et al
as 1:2009cv02670
Petitioner: LEMUEL LAWSON
Respondent: WARDEN - C.F.C.F., CAMDEN COUNTY BD. OF PAROLE and DISTRICT ATTY. OF PHILA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?