Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
VOSS et al v. SMASH FRANCHISE PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
REBECCA VOSS and THOMAS VOSS
Defendant:
JUSTIN HASKIN and SMASH FRANCHISE PARTNERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
UNITED STATES v. VOSS
as 3:2020cv02800
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
VOSS
Respondent:
THOMAS VOSS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Voss v. Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2012cv00368
Plaintiff:
Thomas Voss
Defendant:
Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd., Hitachi Koki Sales, Co., LTD. and Hitachi Koki, USA, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joseph Christner v. Thomas Voss
as 08-55328
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH CHRISTNER
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS VOSS, Executive Director
Kitchens v. Voss
as 08-15322
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JACKSON KITCHENS
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS VOSS
McCurdy v. The People of California et al
as 5:2007cv04072
Petitioner:
Rex A. McCurdy
Respondent:
The People of the State of California, Napa County and Thomas Voss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jennings v. People of The State of California et al
as 2:2007cv01427
Petitioner:
Paul Jennings
Respondent:
People of The State of California and Thomas Voss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jesse Brien Brittain v. Stephen W Mayberg et al
as 5:2007cv00638
Petitioner:
Jesse Brien Brittain
Respondent:
Stephen W Mayberg and Thomas Voss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
