Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Michael Hickingbottom v. Christopher Holcomb, et al
as 25-1344
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. HICKINGBOTTOM
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB, JAY HENDRIX, TAWNI TEMPLETON and others
Stephen Byrd v. Brittnee Smith, et al
as 24-2663
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BYRD
Defendant:
FRANK LITTLEJOHN, DANITA REED, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
BLUE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Defendant:
THOMAS WELLINGTON, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN ELMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CUPP et al
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CUPP, BLAYZE RODGERS, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. NICHOLS et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SHADRAK NICHOLS, LAUREN CUPP, SAMUEL BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. ARNOLD et al
as 2:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
ARNOLD, MARK SMITH JR, ASHBA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARD v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. WARD
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES LLC, BOBBI RIGGS, SARA BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, DENTIST, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. VANIHEL
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, THOMAS WELLINGTON, T. TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
