Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Valentino v. Dickhaut et al

as 1:2011cv10680
Plaintiff:
Facey Valentino
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Mendonsa and R. Raymond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordero v. Dickhaut et al

as 1:2011cv10098
Plaintiff:
Alex Cordero
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut , Osvaldo Vidal and Anthony Mendonsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Dickhaut et al

as 4:2011cv40004
Plaintiff:
Rico Perry
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Mendonsa, Terrance J. Fougere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sires v. Hefferman et al

as 1:2010cv11993
Plaintiff:
William S. Sires
Defendant:
Mary Elizabeth Hefferman, Harold W. Clarke, James Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hennessy v. Clarke, et al
as 10-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDMUND HENNESSY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOUZA-BARANOWSKI CORRECTIONAL CENTER, MCI-SHIRLEY MEDIUM and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN DENNEHY, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LOIS A. RUSSO and others
Abernathy v. Dickhaut, et al

as 1:2010cv11504
Plaintiff:
Franklin B. Abernathy
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Anthony Mendonsa, Robert J. Blood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Clarke et al

as 1:2010cv11381
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Silva
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Thomas Dickhaut, Duane J. MacEachern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Dickhaut

as 1:2010cv11348
Plaintiff:
Darryl T. Scott
Defendant:
Thomas Dickhaut, Osvaldo Vidal and Anthony Mendonsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rasheed v. D'Antonio et al

as 1:2010cv11253
Plaintiff:
Rashad Rasheed
Defendant:
Angela D'Antonio, Marlene Dodge, Dyana Nicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cryer v. UMass Medical Correctional et al

as 1:2010cv11346
Plaintiff:
Derek Sincere Black Wolf Cryer
Defendant:
UMass Medical Correctional, Terre K. Marshall, Dyana Nickl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.